People seemed to be shocked by Trump throwing food around but this behavior is typical of the plutocratic class. If they shit themselves some one has to change his pants and if they take too long and the plutocrat starts reaching into his diaper eating his own shit some one has to make him a cheese burger, even Rupert Murdoch will piss himself in public if he doesn't get his way at a press conference, that's just the way Plutocrats have been brought up.
In Australia we think woman get pregnant by coming into contact with a small tree full of unborn baby spirits from the pass just waiting for a womb like a Kangaroo's pouch to jump into. It is true men like to mastabate on these small shrubs it's called shaking the bush but it never occurred to us this is how women get pregnant so only women who avoid small trees can be accused of abortion?
It great to see the two greatest family bands of the 60's finally join up; The Cowsills and the Beach Boys are now one with John Cowsill filling the void of Dennis and Carl. Of course no-one can fill Brian's shoes but they all had a drunken abusive father as manager.
I always hated Brain Houston he fucked up my family but what surprises me most about these Anti-Christ worshipping Christians is their ignorance of the Gospels (the words and actions of Jesus) and their ignorance of the warnings in the Book of Revelations that anyone with a little knowledge like David Koresh could easy con this flock that he is the expect. Trump did this and he has never read the Bible any more than American Christians have. They teach you to read the Bible as in skip this.
I want to know what SCOTUS would do if a woman was impregnated by Aliens and mid-term they returned teleport the fetus to their UFO to be used in one of their Hybridisation experiments. Would she still be charged with committing an illegal abortion even if she was innocent and had witnesses, how would the supreme justices handle that case?
We all know how pro-rapist and pro-incest, even pro-dad pediophile rapist but how pro-alien is SCOTUS. What if the woman was impregnated with a blinding light by a UFO and mid-term of the pregancy the Aliens return and teleport the fetus onto their space-craft to use in one of their Hybridisation programs. I think the present day supreme justices would have a hard time disproving this statement it's as fool proof as "A dingo ate my baby".
Many Republicans were apoplectic over being asked to wear a mask, or heavens forbid, get vaccinated. But they think it is perfectly fine to force a woman to have a baby and spend the next 18 to 21 years in child rearing whether they can afford it or not.
We all know that labels matter and they matter a lot. Republicans who make up the vast majority of the Prolife crowd are proud to be labeled Prolife. It should be pointed out that this label was deliberately chosen because it sounded life affirming, positive, selected to make the bearer feel good about having such a label applied to them. In truth, we all know that the so-called Prolife do gooders really could care less about actual life. As Joe Scarborough said, “They are Prolife from the moment of conception to the moment of birth.”
Once actual babies are born, they are totally on their own, or I should say their mothers and they are on their own. What being forced to give birth does to the mother is, in their view, totally irrelevant. She could have her education curtailed, have her other children suffer from her inability to work, give birth to a severely handicapped child, suffer debilitating side effects and even death herself. No matter. We all know that Prolifers are in favor of the death penalty, so death is not that bad.
What we need to do is seize the narrative and re-label them to what they really are: they are Pro Forced Birth and not Prolife. Gee, that doesn’t sound so good, does it? It kind of has a negative air, maybe like, if someone was called a Pro Forced Birther, they might not like the label. It might even make them think that it sounds sort of wrong. It sounds like something, in a free society as we mostly believe we are in, that we are forcing people to do something against their will. Hello!? That is exactly what they want. They want to force women to give birth against their will.
Concerning Roe v. Wade, what's going to happen is that there will be an upsurge in crib deaths, and parents will say that "SIDS took the lives" of their (unwanted) babies. And no one will be the wiser. So if the purpose of passing the legislation is to prevent infant mortality, the babies will still die, one way or the other. Thus, the new law isn't going to change anything.
I just think it is wonderful children with dickhead fathers finally winning in the end. Go Cowskills go Beach Boys.
John Cowsill and the Beach Boys what could be better.
People seemed to be shocked by Trump throwing food around but this behavior is typical of the plutocratic class. If they shit themselves some one has to change his pants and if they take too long and the plutocrat starts reaching into his diaper eating his own shit some one has to make him a cheese burger, even Rupert Murdoch will piss himself in public if he doesn't get his way at a press conference, that's just the way Plutocrats have been brought up.
In Australia we think woman get pregnant by coming into contact with a small tree full of unborn baby spirits from the pass just waiting for a womb like a Kangaroo's pouch to jump into. It is true men like to mastabate on these small shrubs it's called shaking the bush but it never occurred to us this is how women get pregnant so only women who avoid small trees can be accused of abortion?
It great to see the two greatest family bands of the 60's finally join up; The Cowsills and the Beach Boys are now one with John Cowsill filling the void of Dennis and Carl. Of course no-one can fill Brian's shoes but they all had a drunken abusive father as manager.
I always hated Brain Houston he fucked up my family but what surprises me most about these Anti-Christ worshipping Christians is their ignorance of the Gospels (the words and actions of Jesus) and their ignorance of the warnings in the Book of Revelations that anyone with a little knowledge like David Koresh could easy con this flock that he is the expect. Trump did this and he has never read the Bible any more than American Christians have. They teach you to read the Bible as in skip this.
I want to know what SCOTUS would do if a woman was impregnated by Aliens and mid-term they returned teleport the fetus to their UFO to be used in one of their Hybridisation experiments. Would she still be charged with committing an illegal abortion even if she was innocent and had witnesses, how would the supreme justices handle that case?
We all know how pro-rapist and pro-incest, even pro-dad pediophile rapist but how pro-alien is SCOTUS. What if the woman was impregnated with a blinding light by a UFO and mid-term of the pregancy the Aliens return and teleport the fetus onto their space-craft to use in one of their Hybridisation programs. I think the present day supreme justices would have a hard time disproving this statement it's as fool proof as "A dingo ate my baby".
Many Republicans were apoplectic over being asked to wear a mask, or heavens forbid, get vaccinated. But they think it is perfectly fine to force a woman to have a baby and spend the next 18 to 21 years in child rearing whether they can afford it or not.
Words Matter, Labels Matter
We all know that labels matter and they matter a lot. Republicans who make up the vast majority of the Prolife crowd are proud to be labeled Prolife. It should be pointed out that this label was deliberately chosen because it sounded life affirming, positive, selected to make the bearer feel good about having such a label applied to them. In truth, we all know that the so-called Prolife do gooders really could care less about actual life. As Joe Scarborough said, “They are Prolife from the moment of conception to the moment of birth.”
Once actual babies are born, they are totally on their own, or I should say their mothers and they are on their own. What being forced to give birth does to the mother is, in their view, totally irrelevant. She could have her education curtailed, have her other children suffer from her inability to work, give birth to a severely handicapped child, suffer debilitating side effects and even death herself. No matter. We all know that Prolifers are in favor of the death penalty, so death is not that bad.
What we need to do is seize the narrative and re-label them to what they really are: they are Pro Forced Birth and not Prolife. Gee, that doesn’t sound so good, does it? It kind of has a negative air, maybe like, if someone was called a Pro Forced Birther, they might not like the label. It might even make them think that it sounds sort of wrong. It sounds like something, in a free society as we mostly believe we are in, that we are forcing people to do something against their will. Hello!? That is exactly what they want. They want to force women to give birth against their will.
Concerning Roe v. Wade, what's going to happen is that there will be an upsurge in crib deaths, and parents will say that "SIDS took the lives" of their (unwanted) babies. And no one will be the wiser. So if the purpose of passing the legislation is to prevent infant mortality, the babies will still die, one way or the other. Thus, the new law isn't going to change anything.