Dems declare Biden impeachment dead, Libertarian calls in AGAIN
The David Pakman Show - March 1, 2024
This installment of The David Pakman Show newsletter is free for everyone. I send these emails daily. If you would also like to receive it, join the newsletter today.
Note: This is totally separate from website Membership and does not affect your website Membership in any way.
Dems declare Biden impeachment dead, but is it really dead?
Following Hunter Biden's testimony on Capitol Hill, Democrats declared the demise of the Biden impeachment inquiry, citing a lack of substantial evidence linking President Biden to his son's business dealings. Democratic Congressmen Jared Moskowitz and Dan Goldman emphasized the absence of new evidence implicating Biden, asserting that the inquiry should be unequivocally terminated. Moskowitz characterized the proceedings as a "fake" and "frivolous" investigation, highlighting the failure to establish any connection between Biden and Hunter's business affairs. Similarly, Goldman emphasized Hunter Biden's clear explanations regarding his business transactions, refuting allegations of wrongdoing. Despite Democrats' assertions, doubts linger regarding the fate of the impeachment inquiry, as Republicans remain steadfast in their pursuit, undeterred by the lack of incriminating evidence. The persistence of the inquiry reflects Republican determination, despite repeated setbacks and embarrassment.
OOPS: Reporter casually destroys Republican's Biden crimes conspiracy
Following Hunter Biden's testimony, Republican Congressman James Comer faced scrutiny from a reporter challenging the validity of the conspiracy theories surrounding Biden's financial dealings. The reporter highlighted that some of the alleged transactions occurred when Joe Biden was a private citizen, raising doubts about claims of influence peddling. Comer appeared flustered, attempting to deflect by shifting the focus to Biden's honesty rather than addressing the lack of evidence tying the transactions to illegal activities. The exchange showcased a pattern of shifting goalposts by Republicans, moving from allegations of policy influence to questioning Biden's integrity. However, the absence of concrete evidence and the timeline of events undermines the credibility of the accusations. Despite years of investigation yielding no substantial findings, Republicans persist in their pursuit, prompting speculation about their willingness to abandon the issue or prolong it until the next election cycle.
From yesterday’s show:
HOLY $&!T: CNN reporter BRUTAL TAKEDOWN over Biden crimes nonsense
Republican Congressman Tim Burchett faced tough questioning from CNN's Boris Sanchez regarding allegations against Vice President Joe Biden and his family's business dealings. Burchett's vague claims lacked substantial evidence, focusing more on insinuations than concrete accusations. Despite assertions about money flowing through accounts and potential wrongdoing, Burchett failed to provide solid evidence linking Joe Biden to any illegal activity. Sanchez pressed him on specifics, highlighting the absence of proof regarding Biden's alleged enrichment while in office. Burchett's reliance on conjecture and broad accusations underscored the lack of substance behind the claims made by some Republicans. Moreover, attempts to paint legitimate business dealings as suspicious fell flat under scrutiny. The exchange revealed the ongoing struggle of Republicans to substantiate allegations against the Bidens, despite years of investigation and Hunter Biden’s recent testimony.
From yesterday’s show:
Corrupt Supreme Court serves Trump, delays his criminal trial
The Supreme Court's decision to hear Donald Trump's claim of presidential immunity signals a significant advantage for the former president, enabling him to delay potential legal consequences. By scheduling a hearing for late April, the justices have effectively prolonged Trump's federal trial, potentially preventing it from commencing before the election. This move aligns with Trump's strategy of evasion, utilizing the legal system to his advantage. The 6-3 conservative composition of the Supreme Court, heavily influenced by Trump's three appointments, raises concerns about the court's role in aiding Trump's political aspirations. Critics fear that a favorable ruling on presidential immunity could set a dangerous precedent, paving the way for authoritarian governance. Moreover, speculation arises about the justices' motivations, with some suggesting they aim to preserve a right-wing court by potentially assisting Trump's reelection bid
More on the show:
-- Caller discusses Lauren Boebert's dismal reelection chances
-- Caller wonders why Trump supporters don't like Mitt Romney
-- Caller asks what it would take to support a Trump pardon
-- Caller asks who Kamala Harris's vice president would be if Biden steps down
-- Libertarian caller returns to debate David
-- The Friday Feedback segment
-- On the Bonus Show: The Friday Bonus Show with Producer Pat
-- Become a Supporter: http://www.davidpakman.com/membership
-- Subscribe on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/thedavidpakmanshow
-- Subscribe to Pakman Live: https://www.youtube.com/pakmanlive